Am Dienstag, den 09.05.2017, 11:10 +0300 schrieb Alexander Kanavin: > On 05/09/2017 01:50 AM, Khem Raj wrote: > > A general usecase is that someone takes the reference and tweaks it to > > meet the needs of a product quickly. For such usecases, it would be good to > > consider the most widely used UI framework in embedded space. I > > personally don't know how much sato is deployed but QT based systems > > are quite widely deployed as far as I know. I think users can drive maximum > > out of the testing and stabilization we do if they were using the reference > > software as much as possible. > > Qt itself does not provide a UI, so we would need to find an appropriate > qt-based replacement for Sato that has the same characteristics and is > suitable as an 'engineering UI'. What is your suggestion for that? > > I personally think meta-qt5 works fine; it's only missing a reference UI > environment. Why not add LxQt to that layer? > Andreas already has those recipes in meta-qt5-extra: https://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/recipe/39614/
And for those who want a look at LXDE: http://git.toradex.com/cgit/meta-lxde.git/tree/recipes-lxde/packagegroup/packagegroup-lxde-extended. bb?h=master Max > > Alex -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
