On Monday, 8 May 2017 11:39:53 PM NZST Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On 05/08/2017 02:33 PM, Jussi Kukkonen wrote: > > Sato is extremely lightweight (not just runtime-wise but with regards to > > build time and maintenance effort). I admit I'm not familiar with LXDE > > but other DEs known as lightweight are in reality on another level > > compared to Sato... Sato projects themselves are tiny and depend on very > > little: this is quite beneficial since it keeps the automated test > > runtimes reasonable. > > LXDE in particular is Gtk2 based, it's no longer being developed, and > has been superseded by LXQt. So it's a non-starter (and so is LXQt, > which should be clear from its name :).
FWIW I think this is a little short-sighted. Why are we ruling out Qt exactly? Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
