On 7/30/13 7:24 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Phil Blundell <[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 09:00 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
To make this, we cannot reuse Poky distro for example as it
/unconditionally/ appends to DISTRO_FEATURES. Besides it is easier for
test to be able to override it using local.conf. For products I agree
we'll end adding a distro to make it reprodicable but for development
stage this trick makes life much easier.

Surely for one-off tests you can just write out the whole intended value
of DISTRO_FEATURES in your local.conf.  It doesn't seem as though this
variable is unwieldy enough that it really needs mechanical handling.

As for poky appending to DISTRO_FEATURES rather than just setting it,
that sounds like it's arguably a bug in poky and you should perhaps take
it up with those guys.  Of course, they might take the view that poky
itself is meant to be determining what DISTRO_FEATURES it wants and they
don't want to support or encourage random frobbing of flags by third
parties, and I think that'd be an understandable position.

We call it and /finalize/ the database so it has _append/_prepend
resolved before mangling the list.

That seems a bit unwholesome in itself.  Are you sure there are no
potential bad consequences from calling finalize() there?

No; I am not sure. What I know is it has been being used by meta-metro
and O.S. Systems distribution without issues for a while and it solves
the problem I have.

Adding /full/ distro features list is ugly and easy to get wrong. This
seems much better for user IMO.

I agree with the previous folks that the design of the distribution setting the one and true value is the right technical answer for this. HOWEVER, in my experience, this is NOT what end users want.

They want a method similar to the one posted by Otavio in order to tailor the system. End users never want to create a new distribution, they simply want to start with one and tweak it.

So with that said, my opinion is to enable this code, allowing end users to tweak their distribution settings. But make it a stated policy that distribution layers should only "set" the value of DISTRO_FEATURES, and should never modify/update this new EXTRA_DISTRO_FEATURES value. (Of course, I doubt there is a way to police that, other then state it's policy.)

This is the same type of reason that end users was a "don't install this package" feature as well. While anyone can write a new image recipe, nobody wants to, especially when they only want one or two less packages in their image.

--Mark

--
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core


_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to