On Tuesday, May 14, 2013, Paul Eggleton <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tuesday 14 May 2013 07:33:49 Khem Raj wrote: >> On Tuesday, May 14, 2013, RicharPurdie < [email protected]> >> wrote: >> > On Mon, 2013-05-13 at 23:45 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >> >> libtirpc is looked for by configure and if found >> >> its enabled. So lets make it consistent and enable >> >> it always >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <[email protected]> >> >> --- >> >> >> >> meta/recipes-extended/pam/libpam_1.1.6.bb | 2 +- >> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> > >> > What is the benefit of this dependency? >> >> When building from sstate the build of libpam would fail during configure >> if the machine who populated sstate had libtirpc staged before building >> libpam and with high parallelism its quite often > > Understood, but the question was what is the benefit of the added dependency on > libtirpc; i.e. should we really be explicitly enabling this or explicitly > disabling it?
There is no knob to disable/disable it. Adding one would be ideal but for another day > > Cheers, > Paul > > -- > > Paul Eggleton > Intel Open Source Technology Centre >
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
