On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Richard Purdie <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 12:26 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Richard Purdie >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Sat, 2012-09-22 at 19:13 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: >> >> * it doesn't make much sense with PV, because xserver-xorg-module-exa >> >> was introduced in >> >> >> >> http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-xserver?id=1a666ee1cda3c0b74daba5881fc5f62e13deec66 >> >> so our xserver-xorg-module-exa RCONFLICTS with xserver-xorg (<= >> >> 1.11.2-r4) >> >> and (< 1.11.2) is not good enough >> >> >> >> * because we don't know how many PRINC are in BSP/DISTRO layers, >> >> then it's safer to RCONFLICTS with every older version then current >> >> EXTENDPKGV >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <[email protected]> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> * I haven't really tested this with IPK, since it was changed from >> >> RREPLACES to RCONFLICTS (because of RPM) and all my installed devices >> >> are already upgraded >> >> --- >> >> meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-xserver/xserver-xorg.inc | 2 +- >> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> >> >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-xserver/xserver-xorg.inc >> >> b/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-xserver/xserver-xorg.inc >> >> index 33f59fe..7513399 100644 >> >> --- a/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-xserver/xserver-xorg.inc >> >> +++ b/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-xserver/xserver-xorg.inc >> >> @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ PACKAGES =+ "${PN}-security-policy \ >> >> >> >> RRECOMMENDS_${PN} += "${PN}-security-policy xkeyboard-config rgb >> >> xserver-xf86-config" >> >> RDEPENDS_${PN}-xvfb += "xkeyboard-config" >> >> -RCONFLICTS_${PN}-module-exa = "${PN} (< ${PV})" >> >> +RCONFLICTS_${PN}-module-exa = "${PN} (< ${EXTENDPKGV})" >> >> >> >> FILES_${PN} = "${bindir} ${libdir}/X11/Options ${libdir}/X11/Cards >> >> ${libdir}/X11/getconfig ${libdir}/X11/etc ${libdir}/modules/*.so >> >> ${libdir}/xorg/modules/*.so /etc/X11 ${libdir}/xorg/protocol.txt >> >> ${datadir}/X11/xorg.conf.d" >> >> FILES_${PN}-dev += "${libdir}/xorg/modules/*.la >> >> ${libdir}/xorg/modules/*/*.la" >> > >> > The original patch and this patch are wrong, this value should not be >> > "floating". It should be spelt out explicitly so it doesn't change with >> > the recipe version in future.: >> > >> > RCONFLICTS_${PN}-module-exa = "${PN} (< 1.11.2-r4)" >> >> So every layer with PRINC in xserver-xorg needs to add >> RCONFLICTS_${PN}-module-exa = "${PN} (< >> 1.11.2-rTHEIR_PR_AT_THE_TIME_OF_CHANGE) ? >> What if there is more layers then one with PRINC and they don't know >> about each other? > > There is a problem there, yes and we're on uncharted territory here. If > people were using the PR service rather that trying to force package > management problems into the core we wouldn't have this kind of problem. > > As a solution, how about appending something to PV? I don't like it but > an artificial PV step should "resolve" this.
Why not RCONFLICT with every older version then current? It's true that e.g. 1.11.2-r8 does not really conflict with 1.11.2-r7 (but r4 in most cases), but that should work. _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
