On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Paul Eggleton <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thursday 17 May 2012 14:16:37 Tom Rini wrote: >> All that's happened is that meta-oe has been working as intended and put >> in a newer version of a recipe, before oe-core can move to it, and found >> problems that need to be addressed. > > This is where I disagree - IMHO meta-oe should be split such that you can get > the additional recipes in it without unexpected surprises like critical system > components (like udev) being up-revved and then breakage resulting. There is > some work needed to get to this point but we need to keep moving towards it I > think.
>From time to time it is easier to avoid to work in OE-Core and work in meta-oe or another layer; udev is no different. It has been update in meta-oe long time ago and many people use and depends on it. It is important to state that if OE-Core breaks Meta-OE this is crticial. It is not Yocto that people use and many active contributors use Meta-OE so it is important and critical to that people. Seems more health to the project to give the deserved value to Meta-OE instead of badmouth it... -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: [email protected] http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
