On Mon Mar 30, 2026 at 4:43 PM CEST, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Mon, Mar 30, 2026 at 4:36 PM Yoann Congal <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Mon Mar 30, 2026 at 12:46 AM CEST, Yoann Congal wrote: >> > From: Martin Jansa <[email protected]> >> > >> > glibc-2.43 isn't used in OE builds yet, but this fixes dtc-native: >> > https://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/903983/ >> > >> > ../sources/dtc-1.7.2/libfdt/fdt_overlay.c: In function >> > ‘overlay_fixup_phandle’: >> > ../sources/dtc-1.7.2/libfdt/fdt_overlay.c:424:21: error: assignment >> > discards ‘const’ qualifier from pointer target type >> > [-Werror=discarded-qualifiers] >> > 424 | sep = memchr(fixup_str, ':', fixup_len); >> > | ^ >> > ../sources/dtc-1.7.2/libfdt/fdt_overlay.c:434:21: error: assignment >> > discards ‘const’ qualifier from pointer target type >> > [-Werror=discarded-qualifiers] >> > 434 | sep = memchr(name, ':', fixup_len); >> > | ^ >> > cc1: all warnings being treated as errors >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <[email protected]> >> > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Dubois-Briand <[email protected]> >> > Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <[email protected]> >> > [YC: upstream commit 28552a7b6c94060c7ab3899619ab8afb74124d02] >> > Signed-off-by: Yoann Congal <[email protected]> >> > --- >> >> Hello Martin, >> >> FYI, while it looked good, this patch and your whole series about glibc >> 2.43 support: >> * [scarthgap 04/11] dtc: backport fix for build with glibc-2.43 >> * [scarthgap 05/11] pseudo: Add fix for glibc 2.43 >> * [scarthgap 06/11] yocto-uninative: Update to 5.0 for needed patchelf >> updates >> * [scarthgap 07/11] yocto-uninative: Update to 5.1 for glibc 2.43 >> * [scarthgap 08/11] elfutils: don't add -Werror to avoid discarded-qualifiers >> * [scarthgap 09/11] binutils: backport patch to fix build with glibc-2.43 on >> host >> ... will be put on hold until I can test it: So, not until Ubuntu 26.04 >> is released and the autobuilder gain an Ubuntu 26.04 worker (most likely >> after Wrynose release). > > OK, I have similar 7 patch series with additional fix for m4, gettext, > systemd for whinlatter. Should I send it for review or put it on hold > as well?
Hold them as well. For the same reason, I won't be able to accept them before whinlatter EOL. > I've built images with latest 26.04 snapshot in docker with scarthgap, > whinlatter, wrynose for rpi - there might be more native recipes used > for other BSPs (or included only in bitbake world), but build-wise > these 2 series should cover most of it. That's good to know, thanks! > Regards, -- Yoann Congal Smile ECS
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#234241): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/234241 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/118570977/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
