Joshua Watt schrieb am Mi 25. Mär, 16:17 (-0600):
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2026 at 1:56 PM Jörg Sommer <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Joshua Watt via lists.openembedded.org schrieb am Mi 25. Mär, 11:16 (-0600):
> > > Removes SPDX 2.2 support in favor of SPDX 3 support being the only
> > > option. The SPDX 3 data is far superior to SPDX 2.2 and thus more useful
> > > for SBoM uses cases.
> >
> > s/uses/use/
> >
> > Could this be delayed until after the release of 6.0, so 6.0 would contain
> > SPDX 2.2 support? For internal tools we still use SPDX 2.2
> 
> We already had discussion on the OE arch list:
> https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/topic/proposal_to_drop_spdx_2_2/118281203
> please feel free to chime in there.

Thanks for the link. This helps to argue that our tools must be updated.

-- 
Navimatix GmbH           T: 03641 - 327 99 0
Tatzendpromenade 2       F: 03641 - 526 306
07745 Jena               www.navimatix.de

Geschäftsführer: Steffen Späthe, Jan Rommeley
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Jena, HRB 501480

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#233959): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/233959
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/118505113/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to