This still doesn’t make sense. Any target file is contained in one and only one package. Where is the duplication?
Alex On Tue 11. Feb 2025 at 19.04, Oleksiy Obitotskyy -X (oobitots - GLOBALLOGIC INC at Cisco) <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm sorry, I confused you mentioned term sysroot. It's not about yocto - > we just use the same term because it's very similar > to how it works into yocto. > We got packages as a result of yocto build and use these artefacts > (packages) on next stage to populate > software components content. For some reason we can't use the same > approach with hardlink to deduplicate > components content. > > Regards, > Oleksiy > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Peter Kjellerstedt <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Monday, February 10, 2025 22:05 > *To:* [email protected] <[email protected]>; Oleksiy Obitotskyy > -X (oobitots - GLOBALLOGIC INC at Cisco) <[email protected]> > *Cc:* Ross Burton <[email protected]>; > [email protected] < > [email protected]>; Ruslan Bilovol (rbilovol) < > [email protected]> > *Subject:* RE: [OE-core] [PATCH] systemd: move systemctl utility to > separate subpackage > > Additionally, changing the packaging does not affect what is added to > the sysroot. > > //Peter > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] <openembedded- > > [email protected]> On Behalf Of Alexander Kanavin via > > lists.openembedded.org > > Sent: den 10 februari 2025 18:20 > > To: [email protected] > > Cc: Ross Burton <[email protected]>; openembedded- > > [email protected]; Ruslan Bilovol (rbilovol) > > <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] systemd: move systemctl utility to > separate > > subpackage > > > > They're not actually copied. They're hard-linked from > > sysroots-components/. This is a cheap operation and it doesn't waste > > disk space. > > > > Alex > > > > On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 at 18:05, Oleksiy Obitotskyy via > > lists.openembedded.org <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Alexander, > > > > > > By 'deploying whole systemd' I mean next: > > > > > > Every component copy and installs packages with libraries, utilities > and > > config files in component local sysroot, i.e. directory used to create > > final component image: > > > > > > libsystemd0_255.4 > > > libsystemd-shared_255.4 > > > systemd_255.4 > > > > > > So, on disk we have duplication of files for every component that > depend > > on the systemctl. > > > In case of separate subpackage we have one root component depend on the > > systemd and all other components will contain only systemd-systemctl > > package content. > > > > > > Of course, I understand it's quite a specific scenario. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Oleksiy > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > From: Alexander Kanavin <[email protected]> > > > Sent: Monday, February 10, 2025 13:03 > > > To: Oleksiy Obitotskyy -X (oobitots - GLOBALLOGIC INC at Cisco) > > <[email protected]> > > > Cc: Ross Burton <[email protected]>; openembedded- > > [email protected] <[email protected]>; > > Ruslan Bilovol (rbilovol) <[email protected]> > > > Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] systemd: move systemctl utility to > > separate subpackage > > > > > > On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 at 13:01, Oleksiy Obitotskyy via > > > lists.openembedded.org <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > We have next situation: > > > > - a lot of software components that depend on packages and deploy all > > packages they depend on locally inside component. > > > > - some components directly depend on systemctl only (e.g. this binary > > used in scripts), so for every component we have to deploy whole systemd > > locally. > > > > - finally, all/some of those components will be merged in some way > and > > will use systemd/libsystemd, but until then it will be nice to get rid of > > such duplication. > > > > > > I'm sorry, but this does not quite make sense. You need to more > > > specifically describe what 'deploying whole systemd' means, and why is > > > that problematic. > > > > > > Alex > > > > > > > > > >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#211161): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/211161 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/111032725/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
