On Thu, Dec 5, 2024 at 11:11 AM Mikko Rapeli <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 10:43:19AM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > > Does this swig upgrade fix the issue with work around added in: > > https://git.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded/commit/?id=f9158ce32fffa6f18eed4008c3295146c81d55ea > > if yes, can you please send revert of this work around to meta-oe? > > Unfortunately no. Without f9158ce32fffa6f18eed4008c3295146 in > meta-openembedded > python3-m2crypto fails: > > | src/SWIG/_m2crypto_wrap.c: In function '_wrap_fd_set___fds_bits_set': > | src/SWIG/_m2crypto_wrap.c:11826:88: error: 'fd_set' has no member named > '__fds_bits'; did you mean 'fds_bits'? > | 11826 | for (; ii < (size_t)1024/(8*(int) sizeof(__fd_mask)); ++ii) > *(__fd_mask *)&arg1->__fds_bits[ii] = *((__fd_mask > *)arg2 + ii); > | | > ^~~~~~~~~~ > | | > fds_bits > | src/SWIG/_m2crypto_wrap.c: In function '_wrap_fd_set___fds_bits_get': > | src/SWIG/_m2crypto_wrap.c:11851:48: error: 'fd_set' has no member named > '__fds_bits'; did you mean 'fds_bits'? > | 11851 | result = (__fd_mask *)(__fd_mask *) ((arg1)->__fds_bits); > | | ^~~~~~~~~~ > | | fds_bits > > With workaround f9158ce32fffa6f18eed4008c3295146c build passes.
Thank you for checking.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#208374): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/208374 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/109936275/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
