On Tuesday 03 April 2012 11:52:07 Gary Thomas wrote: > Why are both opkg-native and rpm-native needed to build images? > When I asked this previously, I was told that rpm was used because > it has superior dependency tracking. Fair enough (I guess), but > then why is opkg required if I build an image using > PACKAGE_CLASSES = "package_rpm"
On the face of it it seems odd; however the reason you get both built no matter which you choose is we need some component of each one regardless of what packaging system is chosen: * opkg is needed to provide update-alternatives-cworth * rpm is needed to provide rpmdeps Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
