On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 at 18:24, Richard Purdie <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm thinking having usrmerge disabled makes it more likely we'd notice > a "bad" tool path creeping into builds rather than the case where the > host and target share the same paths. That isn't a reproducibility > case, more a general one.
But then should we really drop usrmerge/systemd from reproducibility as the bad path wouldn't be noticed until runtime (or maybe in package_qa), and that is tested elsewhere? FWIW, I'm not particularly happy that systemd is nowadays de facto dictating filesystem layouts. Or that you can use any libc you like, as long as it's glibc. And that all/most key developers are employed by Microsoft. Monocultures are not good, even if source code is available. Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#185813): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/185813 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/100663206/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
