Hello Luca,
Am Mittwoch, dem 26.04.2023 um 14:12 +0200 schrieb Luca Ceresoli:
> Hello Enrico,
>
> On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 20:47:11 +0200
> Enrico Jörns <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > This adds support for the barebox bootloader (and tools) to oe-core.
> >
> > In order to have proper testing, this extends oe-selftest to allow
> > basic testing of bootloaders. While at it, cover both barebox and u-boot.
>
> Some tests are failing with this series applied. Logs looking like:
thank you for the test results.
> --------------------------------8<--------------------------------
>
> 2023-04-26 02:45:38,232 - oe-selftest - INFO -
> barebox.BareboxTest.test_boot_barebox
> (subunit.RemotedTestCase)
> 2023-04-26 02:45:38,232 - oe-selftest - INFO - ... skipped 'Test skipped on
> x86_64\n'
> 2023-04-26 02:45:38,232 - oe-selftest - INFO - 1: 1/47 2/530 (0.00s) (0
> failed)
> (barebox.BareboxTest.test_boot_barebox)
> 2023-04-26 02:45:38,232 - oe-selftest - INFO - Test skipped on x86_64
> 2023-04-26 02:46:47,829 - oe-selftest - INFO -
> fetch.Dependencies.test_dependencies
> (subunit.RemotedTestCase)
> 2023-04-26 02:46:47,829 - oe-selftest - INFO - ... ok
> 2023-04-26 02:46:47,829 - oe-selftest - INFO - 12: 2/20 3/530 (70.93s) (0
> failed)
> (fetch.Dependencies.test_dependencies)
> 2023-04-26 02:46:54,605 - oe-selftest - INFO -
> barebox.BareboxTest.test_boot_barebox_efi
> (subunit.RemotedTestCase)
> 2023-04-26 02:46:54,605 - oe-selftest - INFO - ... FAIL
> Stderr:
> 2023-04-26 02:45:38,230 - oe-selftest - INFO - Adding: "include selftest.inc"
> in
> /home/pokybuild/yocto-worker/oe-selftest-debian/build/build-st-3126928/conf/local.conf
> 2023-04-26 02:45:38,231 - oe-selftest - INFO - Adding: "include bblayers.inc"
> in bblayers.conf
> 2023-04-26 02:46:54,606 - oe-selftest - INFO - 1: 2/47 4/530 (76.37s) (0
> failed)
> (barebox.BareboxTest.test_boot_barebox_efi)
> 2023-04-26 02:46:54,606 - oe-selftest - INFO -
> testtools.testresult.real._StringException:
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/home/pokybuild/yocto-worker/oe-selftest-
> debian/build/meta/lib/oeqa/core/decorator/__init__.py", line 35, in wrapped_f
> return func(*args, **kwargs)
> File "/home/pokybuild/yocto-worker/oe-selftest-
> debian/build/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/barebox.py", line 63, in
> test_boot_barebox_efi
> bitbake(image)
> File
> "/home/pokybuild/yocto-worker/oe-selftest-debian/build/meta/lib/oeqa/utils/commands.py",
> line 234, in bitbake
> return runCmd(cmd, ignore_status, timeout, output_log=output_log,
> **options)
> File
> "/home/pokybuild/yocto-worker/oe-selftest-debian/build/meta/lib/oeqa/utils/commands.py",
> line 212, in runCmd
> raise AssertionError("Command '%s' returned non-zero exit status %d:\n%s"
> % (command,
> result.status, exc_output))
> AssertionError: Command 'bitbake core-image-minimal' returned non-zero exit
> status 1:
> Loading cache...done.
> Loaded 0 entries from dependency cache.
> Parsing recipes...done.
> Parsing of 955 .bb files complete (0 cached, 955 parsed). 1872 targets, 55
> skipped, 0 masked, 0
> errors.
> NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies
> ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'barebox' (but
> /home/pokybuild/yocto-worker/oe-selftest-
> debian/build/meta/recipes-core/images/core-image-minimal.bb,
> /home/pokybuild/yocto-worker/oe-
> selftest-debian/build/meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-boot.bb
> RDEPENDS on or
> otherwise requires it)
> barebox was skipped: PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/bootloader set to u-boot, not
> barebox
> NOTE: Runtime target 'barebox' is unbuildable, removing...
> Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['barebox']
> ERROR: Required build target 'core-image-minimal' has no buildable providers.
> Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['core-image-minimal', 'barebox']
> Summary: There were 2 ERROR messages, returning a non-zero exit code.
>
> --------------------------------8<--------------------------------
It seems as if I did not re-test the EFI test after having set
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/bootloader
to "u-boot" in the machine conf. I will add a
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/bootloader = "barebox" to
the test case.
>
> Some logs are here:
>
> https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/80/builds/5054/steps/14/logs/stdio
> https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/86/builds/5096/steps/14/logs/stdio
There are some wic failures where I am not sure yet if these are caused by my
patchset or not.
> FYI I had to manually solve a trivial conflict on patch 5 due to
> another patch in my branch that is touching the same file:
> https://lore.kernel.org/openembedded-core/[email protected]/
I am not really unconvinced that this patch set should be applied as-is.
It copies most of the run_serial() method 'just' to change the return value.
It would also require to duplicate my adaptions.
Thanks and regards
Enrico
> Best regards,
> Luca
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Enrico Jörns |
Embedded Linux Consulting & Support | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | Phone: +49-5121-206917-180 |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Fax: +49-5121-206917-9 |
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#180444):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/180444
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/98499551/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
