I just met the same issue. My host is ubuntu18, gcc version is 7.5.0.

Regards,
Qi

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
<[email protected]> On Behalf Of Mark Hatle
Sent: Tuesday, April 4, 2023 10:25 AM
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer 
<[email protected]>
Subject: [OE-core] mesa-native fails on master

It's been a few weeks since I last built master, but starting with today's pull 
I'm getting errors building mesa-native -- which pretty much kills the whole 
build.

I'm on an Ubuntu 18.04 host, and have the 'buildtools-tarball' from the last
4.1.3 loaded so I can get to the minimum version of python to run a build.

(I tried with buildtools-tarball-extended and that DOES appear to work.  If 
this is expected, you can ignore the rest of this.  But I expected the system 
to complain before trying to build everything if the compiler wasn't new 
enough.)


The error is:

brw_simd_selection.cpp:205:7: sorry, unimplemented: non-trivial designated 
initializers not supported


The host gcc is 7.5.0

What is strange is I had 2 successful builds, and then it started failing.  All 
fresh builds.  I've no idea why one was successful and the others failed.  I'm 
wondering if maybe there is some sort of race in mesa, but lowered my parallel 
build (-j) to 1 and I'm still getting it.


Reproducer:

git clone https://git.yoctoproject.org/poky

cd poky

wget 
http://downloads.yoctoproject.org/releases/yocto/yocto-4.1.3/buildtools/x86_64-buildtools-nativesdk-standalone-4.1.3.sh

bash x86_64-buildtools-nativesdk-standalone-4.1.3.sh -d buildtools -y

. ./buildtools/environment-...

. ./oe-init-build-env

bitbake mesa-native


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#179667): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/179667
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/98052337/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to