On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Saul Wold <[email protected]> wrote: > On 01/28/2012 04:00 PM, Andreas Müller wrote: >> >> Native support currently is appended in meta-oe. Native build failed with: >> >> | /usr/share/gir-1.0/GLib-2.0.gir:9:1: error: Unsupported version '1.1' >> | /usr/share/gir-1.0/GLib-2.0.gir:9:39: error: Unsupported version '1.1' >> | error parsing file Atk-1.0.gir: Failed to parse included gir GLib-2.0 >> | make[3]: *** [Atk-1.0.typelib] Error 1 >> >> build tested in meta-oe / angstrom environment >> >> Signed-off-by: Andreas Müller<[email protected]> >> --- >> meta/recipes-support/atk/atk.inc | 13 ------------- >> meta/recipes-support/atk/atk_2.2.0.bb | 17 +++++++++++++---- >> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) >> delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-support/atk/atk.inc >> >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/atk/atk.inc >> b/meta/recipes-support/atk/atk.inc >> deleted file mode 100644 >> index 6a4fef6..0000000 >> --- a/meta/recipes-support/atk/atk.inc >> +++ /dev/null >> @@ -1,13 +0,0 @@ >> -DESCRIPTION = "An accessibility toolkit for GNOME." >> -HOMEPAGE = "http://live.gnome.org/GAP/"; >> -BUGTRACKER = "https://bugzilla.gnome.org/"; >> - >> -LICENSE = "LGPLv2& LGPLv2+" >> >> - >> -SECTION = "x11/libs" >> - >> -DEPENDS = "glib-2.0 gtk-doc-native" >> - >> -inherit autotools pkgconfig >> - >> -EXTRA_OECONF = "--disable-glibtest" >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/atk/atk_2.2.0.bb >> b/meta/recipes-support/atk/atk_2.2.0.bb >> index 0d657b5..74e7288 100644 >> --- a/meta/recipes-support/atk/atk_2.2.0.bb >> +++ b/meta/recipes-support/atk/atk_2.2.0.bb >> @@ -1,14 +1,23 @@ >> -require atk.inc >> +DESCRIPTION = "An accessibility toolkit for GNOME." >> +HOMEPAGE = "http://live.gnome.org/GAP/"; >> +BUGTRACKER = "https://bugzilla.gnome.org/"; >> +SECTION = "x11/libs" >> >> -PR = "r1" >> +LICENSE = "GPLv2+& LGPLv2+" > > Not sure what you changed here, but you did not fix this as Khem suggested.
After Khem's comment I checked the files mentioned in LIC_FILES_CHKSUM and changed from LICENSE = "LGPLv2& LGPLv2+" to LICENSE = "GPLv2+& LGPLv2+" and mentioned this for information in cover-letter for everybody to cross-check. Since my initial patch did not touch license and I don't exactly know how to handle this case what shall I do for V3: 1. Keep LICENSE and move the cover letter explanations to commit message - or 2. Set LGPLv2.1+ as Khem mentioned > Also, if you are making LICENSE changes the note you included in your 00 > Patch email should really be in the Commit message instead. > > Thanks > Sau! Andreas _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
