On Fri, 2021-07-30 at 11:08 +0200, Nicolas Dechesne wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 10:03 AM Richard Purdie > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, 2021-07-22 at 14:46 +0200, Nicolas Dechesne wrote: > > > It has been recentely mentioned to me by the YP TSC that a layer must > > > not only pass the yocto-check-layer script, but also all its > > > dependencies. These patches add support for testing dependencies > > > automatically. > > > > > > Patch #1 and #3 are not much related, but improvements I made along > > > the lines. > > > > > > Patch #2 split the internal function into 2 parts, so that we can get > > > the list of dependencies from the main script. > > > > > > Patch #4 is where the processing of the dependencies is done. I chose > > > to enable checking the dependencies by default, and use > > > '--no-auto-dependency' to disable it, we could decide the other way > > > around. For any dependency of the 'layers under test' we will simply > > > add them to the list of layers to test unless they are already there. > > > > > > Here is a sample output with these changes: > > > > > > $ yocto-check-layer /work/oe/sources/meta-aws \ > > > --dependency /work/oe/sources/meta-openembedded/ > > > > > > INFO: Summary of results: > > > INFO: > > > INFO: meta-aws ... PASS > > > INFO: meta-python ... PASS > > > INFO: meta-oe ... PASS > > > INFO: meta-networking ... PASS > > > > We merged this but have started seeing: > > > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/121/builds/166 > > > > which seems a little strange and is probably related to this series. > > > > > yes, it's related. > > ... > INFO: Adding meta-poky to the list of layers to test, as a dependency > ... > INFO: meta-poky ... SKIPPED (Layer under test should not present in BBLAYERS) > > With these changes, we are now adding all dependencies and trying to test > them too. But meta-poky seems to > be in bblayers.conf, and yocto-check-layer won't work since it needs to > compute all checksum *without* the > layer in the config first. > > It is probably a good idea to make sure bblayers only has oe-core when we try > to perform YP compat. > Alternatively, as discussed, we use --no-auto-dependency on AB..
Fair enough, I'll update the config to do that. Cheers, Richard >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#154265): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/154265 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/84377963/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
