On Tue, 2021-06-22 at 17:50 -0400, Scott Weaver wrote:
> I didn't see that this patch was picked up (but maybe I'm looking in the 
> wrong place) and I received the email
> from Stephen that the issue should be moved to 3.4 M2.
> Did I send this to the wrong mailing list or is it not the solution you're 
> looking for?
> 
> I elaborated in bugzilla on why I think just adding the readme file to close 
> this issue is enough but you may
> not have seen that comment or agree. :)
> https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13612
> 
> Scott 
> 
> On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 9:46 PM Scott Weaver via lists.openembedded.org <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> > Added to satisfy the yocto-check-layer tool readme file test.
> > 
> > [YOCTO #13612]
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Scott Weaver <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  meta-skeleton/README.skeleton | 7 +++++++
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 meta-skeleton/README.skeleton
> > 
> > diff --git a/meta-skeleton/README.skeleton b/meta-skeleton/README.skeleton
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000..25468dc87a
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/meta-skeleton/README.skeleton
> > @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
> > +meta-skeleton
> > +=============
> > +
> > +The meta-skeleton layer contains example recipes and configuration files.
> > +
> > +This layer is not intended to demonstrate a Yocto Project Compatible 
> > software layer.
> > +Disable the signature check when testing this layer using the 
> > yocto-check-layer tool.

Sorry, it takes time to page in the context for this.

I think we should fix meta-skeleton to work with yocto-check-layer. I think this
may be relatively simple, we can change the busybox bbappend that is causing the
signature failure to be 'distro' specific, e.g. something like:

-SRC_URI += " \
+SRC_URI_append_mydistro = " \

and then an example is still there but it doesn't break the checks (and isn't
enabled by default). We could add a comment about it being enabled by a custom
distro called 'mydistro'.

That change, along with your README addition should allow the layer tests to 
pass.

Cheers,

Richard


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#153247): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/153247
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/83411485/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to