I intend to make the following changes to specify BSD, is it OK? Before: BSD & ISC & MIT
After: BSD-2-Clause & BSD-3-Clause & BSD-4-Clause & BSD & ISC & MIT -- Best Regards --------------------------------------------------- Wang Mingyu Development Dept.I Nanjing Fujitsu Nanda Software Tech. Co., Ltd.(FNST) No. 6 Wenzhu Road, Nanjing, 210012, China TEL: +86+25-86630566-8568 COINS: 79988548 FAX: +86+25-83317685 MAIL: [email protected] http://www.fujitsu.com/cn/fnst/ > -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Purdie <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, March 19, 2021 5:35 AM > To: Wang, Mingyu/王 鸣瑜 <[email protected]>; > [email protected] > Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] openssh: upgrade 8.4p1 -> 8.5p1 > > On Thu, 2021-03-18 at 06:27 +0000, [email protected] wrote: > > > Doesn't that mean we should clarify "BSD" in the LICENSE field then? > > > > I use spdx-tool to find out the following licenses. Do I need to clarify > > them all: > > > > BSD > > BSD-2-Clause > > BSD-3-Clause > > BSD-4-Clause > > SSH-OpenSSH > > Beerware > > MIT > > MIT-style > > ISC > > I found it hard to answer this without knowing what had changed. I went and > looked at the difference between the license file in 8.4p1 and 8.5p1 and the > difference is an algorithm was removed in 8.5 and the associated license > section > was dropped. This doesn't change the license situation so LICENSE is > unchanged. > > We probably do separately need to update LICENSE so show that BSD-2-Clause, > BSD-3-Clause and BSD-4-Clause are all present. > > Cheers, > > Richard > > > > > >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#149653): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/149653 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/81398431/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
