On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 11:32:13AM +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
> Op 28 dec. 2011, om 11:18 heeft Paul Eggleton het volgende geschreven:
>
> > On Wednesday 28 December 2011 10:01:13 Luo Zhenhua-B19537 wrote:
> >> May I know what's the concern with eglibc instead of uclibc?
> >
> > So my concern is, if you add a runtime dependency on eglibc-dbg to valgrind
> > and you've selected uclibc instead, it will force installation of eglibc
> > when
> > you install valgrind (not to mention building it when you build valgrind);
> > this is almost certainly not what you want.
> >
> > If a dependency on the libc debug packages is really needed you could do
> > something this instead:
> >
> > RRECOMMENDS_${PN} += "${TCLIBC}-dbg"
>
> Or:
>
> RECOMMENDS_libc-glibc = "glibc-dbg"
with extra R and PN, right?
RRECOMMENDS_${PN}_libc-glibc = "glibc-dbg"
Regards,
> I'm not sure which one is better, but I wanted to point out the libc
> overrides :)
>
> regards,
>
> Koen
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
--
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
