Hi Bruce, Hi Andrey
Am Freitag, den 10.07.2020, 15:21 +0200 schrieb Andrey Zhizhikin:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 2:47 PM Bruce Ashfield <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 5:06 AM Max Krummenacher <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > In the case of no patches or no configure fragments, during
> > > do_kernel_metadata() scc is not called, and thus
> > > kernel-sources/${meta_dir}/config.queue is not created.
> > > Later do_kernel_configme fails because the file is missing.
> >
> > This is a really strange case, since in tree and defconfigs go through
> > the queue.
> > How are you ending up in this situation in the first place?
I have a kernel recipe with SRC_URI = "git://kernel-git file://defconfig"
As far as I understand it no configure fragments kick in from anywhere.
Whith that the above case is what happens, i.e. none of the variables put
together to
form 'elements' have any content.
Notably, $sccs is empty. I.e. if I add some bbwarns after the sccs assignment
sccs="$sccs_from_src_uri"
bbwarn "sccs " $sccs
bbwarn "sccs_from_src_uri " $sccs_from_src_uri
bbwarn "sccs_defconfig " $sccs_defconfig
I get:
WARNING: sccs
WARNING: sccs_from_src_uri
WARNING: sccs_defconfig
.../recipes-kernel/linux/linux-toradex-4.14-2.3.x/mx8/defconfig
sccs_defconfig has been removed from the variables which form elements in commit
23dcff0d396c (oe: e6845327b693) (kernel/yocto: ensure that defconfigs are
processed first). Was that removal not intended?
In which of the variables would you expect an out of tree defconfig to end up?
I admit I lack the big picture of what kgit, scc and do_kernel_metadata and
friends really do, I wrote the patch under the impression that without
configuration fragments or patches one should not run scc here.
>
> Can this be the same issue that was solved when defconfig is not in-tree?
>
> I guess this could happen only when the list of elements defined as:
> elements="`echo -n ${bsp_definition} ${sccs} ${patches} ${KERNEL_FEATURES}`"
> would contain nothing at all, which means that even a defconfig is not
> found...
>
> Max,
> Can you reproduce this issue from the latest master? Fix for searching
> for OOT defconfig is already merged there (see [1]).
Yes, I can, actually without your patch the build errors out earlier.
You could reproduce it too if you removed
SRC_URI +=
"file://0001-perf-Make-perf-able-to-build-with-latest-libbfd.patch"
from meta-freescale/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-imx_5.4.3.bb and rebuild that
kernel e.g.
MACHINE=imx8qmmek bitbake virtual/kernel -fc kernel_configme
>
> > I'd rather not force create this, but detect the misconfiguration and
> > output a useful error message.
> >
> > Bruce
Max
> [1]:
> http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/?id=7dbc62a672909adce316bb4a8772be0ee9b480fe
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#140521):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/140521
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/75414806/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
