On (28/11/11 16:36), [email protected] wrote:
> From: Nitin A Kamble <[email protected]>
> 
> And rebase the patches to the newer source code
> 
> This patch is upstream hence deleting it from the recipe.
>       binutils/110-arm-eabi-conf.patch
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble <[email protected]>
> ---
>  meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc        |    2 +-
>  ..._2.21.1a.bb => binutils-cross-canadian_2.22.bb} |    2 +-
>  ...ils-cross_2.21.1a.bb => binutils-cross_2.22.bb} |    0
>  ...osssdk_2.21.1a.bb => binutils-crosssdk_2.22.bb} |    2 +-
>  .../binutils/binutils/110-arm-eabi-conf.patch      |   24 -
>  .../binutils/binutils-2.19.1-ld-sysroot.patch      |   10 +-
>  .../binutils/binutils/binutils-poison.patch        |   84 ++-
>  .../binutils/binutils/binutils-powerpc-e5500.patch |   52 +-
>  .../binutils/binutils-uclibc-100-uclibc-conf.patch |   40 +-
>  ...binutils-uclibc-300-001_ld_makefile_patch.patch |   16 +-
>  ...binutils-uclibc-300-006_better_file_error.patch |    9 +-
>  ...ils-uclibc-300-012_check_ldrunpath_length.patch |   12 +-
>  .../binutils/binutils-uclibc-gas-needs-libm.patch  |   11 +-
>  .../binutils/binutils-x86_64_i386_biarch.patch     |   10 +-
>  .../binutils/binutils/clone-shadow.patch           |   18 +-
>  .../binutils/binutils/libiberty_path_fix.patch     |    8 +-
>  .../binutils/binutils/libtool-2.4-update.patch     |  803 
> ++++++++++----------
>  .../binutils/binutils/libtool-rpath-fix.patch      |   11 +-
>  .../{binutils_2.21.1a.bb => binutils_2.22.bb}      |    7 +-
>  19 files changed, 543 insertions(+), 578 deletions(-)
>  rename meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/{binutils-cross-canadian_2.21.1a.bb => 
> binutils-cross-canadian_2.22.bb} (86%)
>  rename meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/{binutils-cross_2.21.1a.bb => 
> binutils-cross_2.22.bb} (100%)
>  rename meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/{binutils-crosssdk_2.21.1a.bb => 
> binutils-crosssdk_2.22.bb} (96%)
>  delete mode 100644 
> meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/110-arm-eabi-conf.patch
>  rename meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/{binutils_2.21.1a.bb => 
> binutils_2.22.bb} (84%)
> 
> diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc 
> b/meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc
> index ed722be..c22e7dc 100644
> --- a/meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc
> +++ b/meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc
> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/gettext ??= "gettext"
>  
>  GCCVERSION ?= "4.6%"
>  SDKGCCVERSION ?= "4.6%"
> -BINUVERSION ?= "2.21.1a"
> +BINUVERSION ?= "2.22"
>  EGLIBCVERSION ?= "2.13"
>  UCLIBCVERSION ?= "0.9.32"
>  LINUXLIBCVERSION ?= "3.1"


What changes does 2.22 bring in, it would be nice to have a little
summary e.g.

http://cygwin.com/ml/binutils/2011-08/msg00129.html

changes default behaviour of linker which needs some mention in such
upgrades since it will bite many packages which dont have proper
dependencies specified.

And I think it would be better to leave the older release recipes in for a while
for at least toolchain components while the new versions gets soaked
in. Given now we have layers its better that way to give some time for
other layers also to test the new version

Thanks

-Khem


_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to