On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Martin Jansa <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 03:33:35PM -0600, Matthew McClintock wrote: >> This dependency causes binutils to get rebuilt for some of >> our parts that are the same TARGET_ARCH but different >> MACHINE. >> >> Signed-off-by: Matthew McClintock <[email protected]> >> --- >> Comments on this? It seems like it might be better to some do this >> in the actual recipes (binutils, gcc-cross, etc) and not globally. >> However, I'm not really sure what goes in MACHINEOVERIDES in >> general and if it could be something that would cause sstate-cache >> to be invalid althogh I could image some scenarios. >> >> meta/conf/bitbake.conf | 1 + >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf >> index b4335c9..48ae458 100644 >> --- a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf >> +++ b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf >> @@ -659,6 +659,7 @@ AUTO_LIBNAME_PKGS = "${PACKAGES}" >> OVERRIDES = >> "${TARGET_OS}:${TARGET_ARCH}:build-${BUILD_OS}:pn-${PN}:${MACHINEOVERRIDES}:${DISTROOVERRIDES}:forcevariable" >> DISTROOVERRIDES ?= "${DISTRO}" >> MACHINEOVERRIDES ?= "${MACHINE}" >> +MACHINEOVERRIDES[vardepsexclude] += "MACHINE" >> >> CPU_FEATURES ?= "" >> CPU_FEATURES_arm ?= "vfp" >> -- >> 1.7.6.1 > > is this of oe-core/master? > > I see similar commit in 362512b83775ad7020e5870a594f0e7ca9ef83ba
It appears this has already been fixed. I was working on edison 1.1. Thanks! -M _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
