On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 16:42 -0600, Matthew McClintock wrote: > The method of resolving the patch should not effect the sstate-cache > signature. > > Signed-off-by: Matthew McClintock <[email protected]> > --- > I'm not 100% sure about this one either - should we even generate > sstate-cache at all if we have a scenario where we try to resolve > a patch? > > meta/classes/patch.bbclass | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Merged to master, thanks. In answer to the question, there clearly shouldn't be a dependency on this variable. We can depend on the variable even if the conditional code using it doesn't actually use the code as the dependency analysis doesn't account for conditional code paths. Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
