Op 23 nov. 2011, om 07:47 heeft Xiaofeng Yan het volgende geschreven: > From: Xiaofeng Yan <[email protected]> > > Hi Richard & all, > > I fixed some problems found at previous submitting and use PACKAGECONFIG to > get mutual configuration between directfb and x11. I hope this submitting > isn't a horrible mess :). > > One previous problem about what happen when user want to have both directfb > and x11 in DISTRO_FEATURES?
That was the question I was going to ask > I think directfb and x11 can't be defined in DISTRO_FEATURES at the same time > because directfb and x11 are the lowest level library for GUI with different > mechanism. I don't understand what the above means, but I've been building both directfb and x11 for some years now and they don't clash. > x11 and directfb should be mutual in DISTRO_FEATURES. User may use file > "meta-yocto/conf/local.conf.sample.extended" to select the mode they want to > need. > but directfb can work in an image with x11. for example, "directfb" and > "direcrfb-examples" can be added to task-core-x11-sato.bb. you can run > df_andi, a demo based on directfb, on matchbox term running on > core-image-sato with x11. So directfb and x11 can exist in the same image but > not be defined in DISTRO_FEATURES at same time. > > If you have any suggestion, I will fix them again. Last time I looked both gtk+ and pango had their backend modularized, so you can build both and install the right one in the rootfs. I think that would be a better way to go. Just look at debian with their gtk-directfb installer, they have gtk-X as well :) regards, Koen
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
