Op 31 okt. 2011, om 16:46 heeft Saul Wold het volgende geschreven: > On 10/31/2011 02:08 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: >> On Wednesday 26 October 2011 21:37:39 Saul Wold wrote: >>>> -RECIPE_TIME_BETWEEN_LAST_TWO_RELEASES_pn-sudo = "1 month" >>>> -RECIPE_LATEST_RELEASE_DATE_pn-sudo = "2011/05/16" >>>> +RECIPE_TIME_BETWEEN_LAST_TWO_RELEASES_pn-sudo = "2 months" >>>> +RECIPE_LATEST_RELEASE_DATE_pn-sudo = "2011/10/21" >>> >>> These date formats should be MMM DD, YYYY also, for all the data listed >>> below also. >> >> I'd been meaning to ask this before - is there a good reason for not being >> consistent and using the same format for all date fields in this file? >> > Maybe I am missing your comment, is that what I not suggested in my comment > above? All date formats in the distro_tracking_fields should be in the MMM > DD, YYY format.
Can we please use a format that makes sense for non-americans as well? E.g. YYYY/MM/DD or DD/MM/YYYY or plain ISO (2011-10-31T17:04:31+01:00) without the hours? Anything that doesn't put days in between months and year. regards, KOen
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
