On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 12:40 AM, Richard Purdie <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 2018-05-07 at 18:22 -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 7:42 PM, Andre McCurdy <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > Daisy has now (long since) left upstream maintenance and entered >> > into >> > community support. As a member of a community which still actively >> > develops against this version of OE, I would like to propose the >> > following updates. >> Ping. >> >> Are these kind of updates OK? Or are there objections to the >> community >> trying to support historical releases? There are many millions of >> devices in the field that I know of which are still being actively >> developed and maintained on top of OE 1.6. > > We've discussed "long term" branches for a while. I suggest that we > collect together people who are will to maintain such things and let > them push to a namespace in poky-contrib initially, perhaps in other > repos eventually where we collect these things together. > > Perhaps poky-contrib extended-life/daisy? > > If there is common agreement, a group of people could collaborate on > such a branch too...
Although there are multiple groups still actively developing against OE 1.6 I fear I may be the only one who has any interest in doing so in public. Hoping for a "group of people" to show up and collaborate on a branch in poky-contrib may be asking for too much. -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
