* Anders Darander <[email protected]> [111026 23:14]: > * Richard Purdie <[email protected]> [111026 23:02]: > > On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 14:25 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > > This changes makes two different 3.x headers available to the > > > toolchain. The latest 3.0.x and 3.1 tarballs. Compatibility is > > > maintained with older 2.6 headers by creating a new variable > > > that changes the SRC_URI based on the major version number of > > > the kernel.
> > > Tested with 2.6.37.2, 3.0.8 and 3.1 builds and boots. > > In answer to your other question, its probably safe to drop the older > > versions and switch to 3.1 at this point unless there are known > > compatibility issues? > Don't we have 2.6-kernel left? If so, I guess that we ought to leave the > 2.6 versions of the recipe. At least if I remember correctly in that a > userspace compiled against a certain version of kernel headers should > run OK on a newer kernel, but isn't guarenteed to run OK on an older > kernel. Correct me if I'm wrong... Forget my reply above, I'm obviously not looking closely enough at the patch. (Which tells me I'm getting tired and should get some rest/sleep). Cheers, Anders -- Anders Darander ChargeStorm AB / eStorm AB _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
