On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 01:09:43PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Martin Jansa <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have noticed that even local patches are stored in downloads dir, > > but today I've noticed that wrong file was used later in do_patch. > > I have latest oe-core/meta-oe + latest bitbake. > > > > Pulseaudio was building here for first time > > > > downloads/buildfix.patch is from previous build of xf86-video-intel-2.16.0 > > $ head downloads/buildfix.patch > > looking in bitbake lib/bb/fetch2/local.py it seems it searches DL_DIR > before other
Which would be wrong for sure if I have foo_1.0.bb with SRC_URI = "file://bar.patch" foo-1.0/om-gta02/bar.patch foo-1.0/nokia900/bar.patch Then I don't want to use bar.patch from downloads/bar.patch where it's from om-gta02 build when I'm building nokia900 now. Regards, > search paths. cleansstate might not have information that the patch > was downloaded > and not applied from local metadata after the recipe is updated. -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
