* Richard Purdie <[email protected]> [111014 13:43]: > On Fri, 2011-10-14 at 12:47 +0200, Anders Darander wrote: > > * Anders Darander <[email protected]> [111014 09:55]: > > > In our local tree, I've circumvented this race by applying a patch like > > > [3]. (Well, we could likely have put the lock in do_make_scripts() > > > instead of module_do_compile(), as we have done currently). Obviously, > > > I'm not proposing to apply this patch, as it depends on lockfile from > > > the procmail-package (host-package).
> > Just to confirm, it seems (after a very few tests) that it indeed is > > enough to guard the do_make_scripts() with the lock. > > However, the question on how to make the real solution remains... > I've not tested this but it might give you enough info to test > something: > (Basic idea is to promote that function to a task, then apply a lock to > it). Just to give you some status feedback. Your code gave me enough to get my previously failed attempt at promoting the function to a task. Which obviously showed a few new problems, which I think I've solved. I'll just want to test it a few more times, but expect a patch today or tomorrow. Cheers, Anders -- Anders Darander ChargeStorm AB / eStorm AB _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
