On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 01:10:02PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On 9/30/2011 12:27 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > * ie om-gta02 has mesa-dri module too > > > > Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa<[email protected]> > > --- > > .../xorg-xserver/xserver-xf86-dri-lite.inc | 3 --- > > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-xserver/xserver-xf86-dri-lite.inc > > b/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-xserver/xserver-xf86-dri-lite.inc > > index 093e049..2e35917 100644 > > --- a/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-xserver/xserver-xf86-dri-lite.inc > > +++ b/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-xserver/xserver-xf86-dri-lite.inc > > @@ -10,6 +10,3 @@ EXTRA_OECONF += "\ > > --with-pic \ > > --with-int10=x86emu \ > > " > > - > > -# Due to mesa-dri > > -COMPATIBLE_HOST = '(i.86.*-linux|x86_64.*-linux)' > > how about powerpc and mips ? they will also become supported with this > change have you tested that
Haven't tested it but iirc building dri extension worked even for powerpc and mips in OE-classic and because xserver-xf86-dri-lite get's default later in this patchset I think it's better without overrestrictive COMPATIBLE_HOST. And as the comment says, the restriction should be in mesa-dri if somewhere (at least only in one place to .bbappend my COMPATIBLE_HOSTs in layer). Regards, -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
