On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Richard Purdie <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 23:20 -0500, Matthew McClintock wrote: >> From: Tom Rini <[email protected]> >> >> At issue is that route/pktloc.c (not generated) depends on >> route/pktloc_syntax.h (generated). >> >> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <[email protected]> >> --- >> .../libnl/fix-pktloc_syntax_h-race.patch | 23 >> ++++++++++++++++++++ >> meta/recipes-support/libnl/libnl_2.0.bb | 3 +- >> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 meta/recipes-support/libnl/fix-pktloc_syntax_h-race.patch >> >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/libnl/fix-pktloc_syntax_h-race.patch >> b/meta/recipes-support/libnl/fix-pktloc_syntax_h-race.patch >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..d396f96 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/meta/recipes-support/libnl/fix-pktloc_syntax_h-race.patch >> @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ >> +--- > > Missing patch header...
How would I mark this when this is an old version of libnl and it appears not to be a problem the latest version of libnl? -M _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
