On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 09:22, Eric Bénard <[email protected]> wrote:
> We could also say that qt 4.7.4 fix many qt 4.7.3 bugs and integrate the
> patch fixing this one and in the end get an improvement.

It has a patch available that fixes the issue, so seems fine for me to
merge it and put this patch too.

Personally I also agree that getting this into the release ought to be
better; specially since it has the fix available on the bug tracking
already.

> I don't understand why oe-core's development has to be stopped by yocto's
> releases process but I may not have found the right page on the wiki
> explaining all the details : may you please give me some links concerning
> this policy ?
>
> Maybe yocto could consider oe-core as an incubator instead of a follower
> else I don't really see why we need to have the same project managed by the
> same peoples with 2 different names.

Personally I don't see it as a problem at least for now. This won't
hurt to have a stabilization work being done from time to time. Maybe
we can even use this to make oe-core releases too and get it more
widely used.

-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
E-mail: [email protected]  http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854              http://projetos.ossystems.com.br

_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to