On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 18:13 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 10:09 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Phil Blundell <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > -FILES_uclibc-dev_append = "\
> > > +FILES_${PN}-dev_append = "\
> >
> > same uclibc.inc is also used by uclibc-initial recipe so using ${PN}
> > may not be ok here
>
> Does uclibc-initial generate any PACKAGES? I rather assumed it was
> sysroot only, in which case the FILES are irrelevant.
>
> In any case, the name of the FILES variable needs to match the value in
> PACKAGES. Having "FILES_uclibc-dev" is no good if PACKAGES talks about
> "${PN}-dev", which appears to be the case here.
... and, maybe more to the point, it's also no good to be doing
"FILES_uclibc-dev_append" when there is a ${PN}-dev definition in
bitbake.conf. They need to be consistent.
p.
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
