On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 19:33 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> Op 1 jul 2011, om 19:25 heeft Mark Hatle het volgende geschreven:
> 
> > On 7/1/11 12:16 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> >> On 07/01/2011 10:12 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> >>> gcc-4.6.0+svnr175150, non dev contains .so, gcc, 
> >>> /work/i586-poky-linux/gcc-4.6.0+svnr175150-r4/packages-split/gcc/usr/libexec/gcc/i586-poky-linux/4.6.1/liblto_plugin.so
> >>>> 
> >> 
> >> This should be packages with gcc itself. May be adding to FILES will get 
> >> rid of this warning
> > 
> > The warning above indicates that it -is- being packaged in the 'gcc' 
> > package.
> > The check verified that no files of the name .so exit and they are not 
> > symlinks:
> > 
> >    if not name.endswith("-dev") and not name.endswith("-dbg") and
> > path.endswith(".so") and os.path.islink(path):
> > 
> > In this case, I believe that the file is likely supposed to be there.  Is 
> > there
> > a way to selectively disable insane checks on a per-recipe basis when we 
> > know
> > they are wrong?
> 
> We only have the big INSANE_SKIP_gcc = True hammer

Although as I hint at in my insane.bbclass patch, I just made it much
easier to implement skipping specific checks. Its not there yet but
shouldn't be too difficult from where the code it at now...

Cheers,

Richard


_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to