On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 23:21 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On 05/31/2011 11:10 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:57:00PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > >> On 05/31/2011 10:26 PM, Saul Wold wrote: > >>> | ../../include/QtCore/../../src/corelib/arch/qatomic_arm.h:361:35: > >>> error: output number 1 not directly addressable > >> > >> this is a coding error you can fix the source code I guess instead of > >> pessimising the whole package > > > > FWIW: I haven't seen it in my armv7-a builds (nokia900), but I'm using > > gcc-4.6 from meta-oe. > > this is because gcc 4.6 in meta-oe has fix for it its this patch here > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-03/msg01477.html
I'm a bit confused by this. In the first quote above you said that this was a coding error and ought to be fixed in qt, but now you seem to be saying that it's a compiler bug and should be fixed in gcc. If it's the latter, can we get that patch applied to the oe-core version of gcc? Either way, I agree, working around this by just frobbing the architecture options seems like a bad idea. p. _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
