On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 10:08 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Saul Wold <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 05/15/2011 11:19 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > >> > >> > >> On May 14, 2011, at 5:23 PM, Saul Wold<[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> From: Saul Wold<[email protected]> > >>> > >>> This proposes to move the YAFFS2-utils, older clutter-1.4 > >>> and older GCC version (4.3.3 and 3.4.4) as they are unused > >>> and currently unbuildable. > >>> > >> > >> Are we left with any GPLv2 version of gcc after this ? > >> > > Khem, > > > > Is not having a GPLv2 version of gcc an issue? For the non-gplv3 version, my > > understanding is to have an installed user-space for oe-core for a > > non-development system, therefore gcc is not an issue. > > > > there are certain parts of gcc which go onto target e.g. libgcc libstdc++
These have specific license exceptions allowing non-gpl code to use them as system libraries though? Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
