On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 04:32:08PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
> Op 6 mei 2011, om 15:54 heeft Martin Jansa het volgende geschreven:
>
> > On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 06:51:58AM -0700, Chris Larson wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 6:39 AM, Koen Kooi <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>> And related to this: how do I get the "installed but not packaged" output
> >>> back? The bitbake logging changes are hiding it now, which is
> >>> counterproductive.
> >>
> >> Could change those messages from info to warnings, then they'd show up.
> >
> > Agreed, please change it. I'm using -v since those were not shown, but -v
> > brings much more noise then I need.
>
> Like this?
>
> --- a/meta/classes/package.bbclass
> +++ b/meta/classes/package.bbclass
> @@ -676,7 +676,7 @@ python populate_packages () {
> unshipped.append(path)
>
> if unshipped != []:
> - bb.note("the following files were installed but not shipped
> in any package:")
> + bb.warn("the following files were installed but not shipped
> in any package:")
> for f in unshipped:
I prefer also with files
- bb.note(" " + f)
+ bb.warn(" " + f)
because later when reading logs from build I can see if it was something
important or just some file I don't need
--
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: [email protected]
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
