Is anyone still using 2.4 kernels? That's what modutils is for, module-init-tools is for 2.6 kernels
Op 25 apr. 2011 om 17:49 heeft Saul Wold <[email protected]> het volgende geschreven: > On 04/25/2011 05:02 AM, Gary Thomas wrote: >> On 04/23/2011 12:28 AM, Saul Wold wrote: >>> From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0tetiar?=<[email protected]> >>> >>> In the current state, udev init script is loaded as 3rd and >>> modutils.sh as >>> 20th, so udevadm called in udev init script loads all kernel modules >>> in some >>> unpredictable order, not honoring in any way specified order of >>> modules in >>> /etc/modules. This causes some troubles mainly in the first boot. So >>> to fix >>> this we now move loading of the kernel modules just before we exec >>> udev init >>> script. Example of the current state: >>> >>> Starting udev >>> rtc-m48t86 rtc-m48t86: rtc core: registered m48t86 as rtc0 >>> rtc-m48t86 rtc-m48t86: battery ok >>> ep93xx-rtc ep93xx-rtc: rtc core: registered ep93xx-rtc as rtc1 >>> >>> root@ts72xx:~# cat /etc/modules >>> rtc-ep93xx >>> ohci-hcd >>> ts72xx_sbcinfo >>> rtc-m48t86 >>> >>> As you can guess, this is really wrong behaviour, because I've rtc1 as >>> the >>> main time source for my system. >>> >>> root@ts72xx:~# cat /etc/default/hwclock >>> HWCLOCKACCESS=yes >>> HWCLOCKDEVICE=/dev/rtc1 >>> >>> Expected behaviour with this patch applied: >>> >>> Please wait: booting... >>> ep93xx-rtc ep93xx-rtc: rtc core: registered ep93xx-rtc as rtc0 >>> usbcore: registered new device driver usb >>> ohci_hcd: USB 1.1 'Open' Host Controller (OHCI) Driver >>> ... >>> rtc-m48t86 rtc-m48t86: rtc core: registered m48t86 as rtc1 >>> rtc-m48t86 rtc-m48t86: battery ok >>> Starting udev >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Petr Štetiar<[email protected]> >>> >>> (based on http://patches.openembedded.org/patch/1917/) >>> Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi<[email protected]> >>> Signed-off-by: Saul Wold<[email protected]> >>> --- >>> .../modutils/modutils-initscripts.bb | 4 ++-- >>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/modutils/modutils-initscripts.bb >>> b/meta/recipes-kernel/modutils/modutils-initscripts.bb >>> index 1665955..5ae34b4 100644 >>> --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/modutils/modutils-initscripts.bb >>> +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/modutils/modutils-initscripts.bb >>> @@ -4,10 +4,10 @@ LICENSE = "PD" >>> LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://LICENSE;md5=7bf87fc37976e93ec66ad84fac58c098" >>> SRC_URI = "file://modutils.sh \ >>> file://PD.patch" >>> -PR = "r4" >>> +PR = "r5" >>> >>> INITSCRIPT_NAME = "modutils.sh" >>> -INITSCRIPT_PARAMS = "start 20 S ." >>> +INITSCRIPT_PARAMS = "start 2 S ." >>> >>> inherit update-rc.d >>> >> >> Should there not be a corresponding change to modutils_2.4.27.bb? It's >> not clear to me >> where there are these two separate recipes, but they should at least be >> kept in sync. >> > Gary, > > Could you please resend this as a proper patch with Signed-off-by and commit > info. > > Thanks > Sau! > >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/modutils/modutils_2.4.27.bb >> b/meta/recipes-kernel/modutils/modutils_2.4.27.bb >> index 1ebc90c..2944201 100644 >> --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/modutils/modutils_2.4.27.bb >> +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/modutils/modutils_2.4.27.bb >> @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ manageable for all users, administrators and >> distribution maintainers." >> LICENSE = "GPLv2" >> LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=8ca43cbc842c2336e835926c2166c28b" >> DEPENDS = "bison-native" >> -PR = "r9" >> +PR = "r10" >> >> SRC_URI = >> "${KERNELORG_MIRROR}/linux/utils/kernel/modutils/v2.4/modutils-${PV}.tar.bz2 >> \ >> file://lex.l.diff;patch=1 \ >> @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ if test -n "$D"; then >> done >> fi >> fi >> -update-rc.d $D modutils.sh start 20 S . >> +update-rc.d $D modutils.sh start 2 S . >> } >> >> pkg_prerm_modutils () { >> _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
