On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 09:40 -0700, Joshua Lock wrote: > On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 16:05 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > On Thursday 21 April 2011 15:02:49 Koen Kooi wrote: > > > and possibly more. I would like to create a meta-gnome layer in the > > > meta-openembedded repository where new recipes get added and things from > > > meta-demoapps can get moved over into. Long term recipes-gnome in oe-core > > > should move there as well. > > > > > > What are your thoughts on this? > > +1 > > > > > From my perspective this sounds like a great idea. The only question would > > be > > how much of the "GNOME" libs would remain in oe-core as some of them are > > quite > > widely used outside of GNOME proper; however that can easily be worked out > > as > > these things mature. > > +1 > > My personal opinion would be that we start with glib & gtk+ (plus their > dependencies, i.e. pango, atk, etc) in core and move the rest out to a > layer.
Do we move out sato as well? > I feel that Gtk+ is used by enough non-gnome software that it belongs in > core but others may disagree? I think it needs to be in the core as we need something there to test X/graphics and so forth. This implies we need sato and its dependencies there too though (which are thankfully minimal by design). Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
