On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 10:33 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Richard Purdie > > I think this is just going to confuse people to be honest. I'm happy to > > stick to the 4.6.0 naming, then move to 4.6.1 and so forth over time. > > People expect to see the .X number else they just get confused about > > which patch revision we're at. > > > > What I'm thinking we will do differently to OE is not to have every > > point release available but try and stick to the latest. The exception > > would be when there is a problem in the point release version which we > > don't have a fix for. > > usually later minor release will always be better (since they are bugfixes > only) > so chances are less that we will regress
Agreed, I'm just being clear what the expectations are! :) > > Does that sound reasonable? > > > > Yes having just one minor release at a time makes it easier certainly. > I was trying to make it easy to push updates and we could avoid some > git operations and logs would be straighter too since recipes would live > longer otherwise we will be git mv'ing them every 6 months when release > happens. I think this is fine, we do this for the other recipes too. Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
