On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 20:31 +0000, Richard Purdie wrote: > There is a problem with the current PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS implementation > since its impossible to control which extra architectures sort higher > than TARGET_ARCH and which sort lower. In the x86 case for example, > TARGET_ARCH might be "i586", i486 should be lower than this and i686 should > be higher. There are also complications where its easy to inject duplicate > entries into the variable. > > I tried various versions of this patch and concluded that it was simplest > just to force the tune files to include TARGET_ARCH in the list in the > right place if they're planning to customise it themselves. Other approaches > with appends and prepends just complicated the code for no good reason. > > The TARGET_ARCH definitions should also move to the tune files but I'll > leave this for a separate patch. > > Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <[email protected]>
Since there were no objections to this (and I chatted to some people over jabber about it too), I'm going to merge this. Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
