On Wed, 2026-02-25 at 13:22 +0800, hongxu via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > Ping, what is the status of the approval from Yocto Project TSC?
>From the TSC perspective, we were waiting on the answers to some of the discussion/questions that were raised. > About the suggestion to rename the layer to meta-ai or meta-llm and > collect other LLM applications, such as llama.cpp. > > I am open to it, but I strongly insist to maintain meta-ollama as a > standalone layer, further more, if we support llama.cpp later, we > should add it as meta-llama-cpp You mean that you don't mind a meta-ai repostory but within that you would want meta-llama and meta-llama-cpp to be separate layers? The other key questions I don't see answered are with regard to: a) contributions - is this open to contributions from others? how would version updates work? what testing needs to pass for patches to merge? Basically, what is the plan for maintaining it? b) specific architecture support - what would someone need to do to add support for a different architecture? c) specific feature support - if someone wants to add a feature WindRiver aren't using, would be it accepted? The TSC needs more information in order to be able to make any kind of decision. Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#2287): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/message/2287 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/117540395/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
