Mary, we also strip the 029s as we don't see any reason to keep them.
I'm just noting that stripping them on import may be why Elaine (&
possibly Don) are unable to add them to records.
- Dea Nowell
On 10/1/2015 10:37 AM, Mary Llewellyn wrote:
We’re stripping the 029s. Am I missing a reason why we should be
keeping them?
Mary
Mary Llewellyn
Database Manager
Bibliomation, Inc.
24 Wooster Ave.
Waterbury, CT 06708
mllew...@biblio.org
*From:*Open-ils-general
[mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] *On Behalf
Of *Dea Nowell
*Sent:* Thursday, October 01, 2015 12:58 PM
*To:* Evergreen Discussion Group
*Subject:* Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029
Elaine, is your system stripping the 029 on import of records into the
system? If so this is why it will not save the 029 in a record. We
just discovered this with our system (Sage Library System) recently
with a different field. Once we removed the field from those that
were being stripped on import we were able to have the field saved in
the bib. Just a thought to explore & it may address Don's query as
well, I'm not sure.
- Dea Nowell
_______________________________
UCSLD logo & tagline
___________________________________
Dea Nowell, Technical Services Manager
Umatilla County Special Library District
17 SW Frazer, Suite 360
P O Box 1689
Pendleton OR 97801
(541) 966-0917 --> (406) 952-4049
email: d...@ucsld.org <mailto:d...@ucsld.org> || web: www.ucsld.org
<http://www.ucsld.org>
On 10/1/2015 9:41 AM, Hardy, Elaine wrote:
I was able to add an 016 to a bib record in the PINES database. I
was not able to add an 029
An 029 is a field used by OCLC to “system control numbers for
records from non-OCLC automated systems (e.g., Library and
Archives Canada, the British Library, WorldCat Cataloging Partners
vendors, etc.). OCLC uses these numbers to process and track
records from other systems.” http://www.oclc.org/bib
formats/en/0xx/029.html
<http://www.oclc.org/bibformats/en/0xx/029.html>. Not sure why it
doesn’t retain on save. An 019, which is another field specific to
OCLC, does (see http://www.oclc.org/bibformats/en/0xx/019.html).
029 seems to be system supplied; but, the 019 is system supplied…
/Elaine/
J. Elaine Hardy PINES & Collaborative Projects Manager Georgia
Public Library Service 1800 Century Place, Ste 150 Atlanta, Ga.
30345-4304
404.235.7128 404.235.7201, fax eha...@georgialibraries.org
<mailto:eha...@georgialibraries.org> www.georgialibraries.org
<http://www.georgialibraries.org> www.georgialibraries.org/pines
<http://www.georgialibraries.org/pines>
*From:*Open-ils-general
[mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] *On
Behalf Of *Donald Butterworth *Sent:* Thursday, October 01, 2015
11:48 AM *To:* Evergreen Discussion Group *Subject:*
[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029
Hi Everyone,
As part of a project to add more fields to the general keyword
index, we discovered that we can't add the 016 and the 029 control
number fields to a MARC record.
It looks like it saves, but it isn't there when you do a new
search. It also never shows on the MARC View screen.
What do we need to do to add these fields?
Thanks!
Don
--
Don Butterworth Faculty Associate / Librarian III B.L. Fisher
Library Asbury Theological Seminary
don.butterwo...@asburyseminary.edu
<mailto:don.butterwo...@asburyseminary.edu> (859) 858-2227
