On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 12:03 PM, jan iversen <[email protected]>wrote:
> A legal question in that respect of logo, is it legal if I write on my > personal blog that I help AOO and use the logo with a link to > openoffice.org? > > Jan. > Jan-- In my opinion, the short answer is "yes"...see general trademark use on: http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/#guidelines The guidelines on the use of the Apache feather apply to the Apache OpenOffice logo as well, *and*, it has the "tm" mark in it. But, do, if you use set it up so it links to either: http://www.openoffice.org/ -- or -- http://openoffice.apache.org Maybe wait a day to do this to see if there are any dissenting opinions to this, though. > > > On 20 October 2012 20:49, Alexandro Colorado <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Rob Weir <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 10:49 AM, RGB ES <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > 2012/10/20 jan iversen <[email protected]> > > > > > > > >> I really like the logo on the openOffice.org site, it is (at least > to > > > me) > > > >> more modern and eye-catching. > > > >> > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >> We should only use 1 logo, that is simpler and for the end-user more > > > >> understandable. > > > >> > > > > > > > > +1 too. > > > > > > > > > > OK. I changed the openoffice.apache.org website to use the same logo > > > as www.openoffice.org. > > > > > > But I am sympathetic to Alexandro's view that we need across-the-board > > > greater consistency on branding. We'll get there, I think, but it > > > will take time. > > > > > > -Rob > > > > > > > Regards > > > > Ricardo > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >> Jan. > > > >> > > > >> On 20 October 2012 16:28, Rob Weir <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > See upper left here: http://openoffice.apache.org > > > >> > > > > >> > The "Incubating" is integrated into the graphic. > > > >> > > > > >> > The underlying file is here: a PNG with transparent background. > > > >> > > > > >> > > > http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/images/300x100_dj_trans.png > > > >> > > > > >> > What do we want to do here? > > > >> > > > > >> > 1) Edit that graphic to remove "Incubating"? > > > >> > > > > >> > 2) Use a different graphic? > > > >> > > > > >> > Note that the http://www.openoffice.org/ site uses a different > form > > > of > > > >> > the branding. Are we intentionally using two different logos > here? > > > >> > Do we want to continue this? > > > > > > > Well most of the artwork is done, is just a matter of doing the commit to > > the right branch. Linux has png files so they are taken from the site, > > which also has the .ico and icm for windows and mac. Besides that, I > wonder > > what else would be needed. > > Example Writer: > > Linux: > > > > > http://www.openoffice.org/ui/VisualDesign/gifs/Icons/refresh_icons/pngs/OOo_Writer_48x48.png > > Windows: > > > > > http://www.openoffice.org/ui/VisualDesign/gifs/Icons/refresh_icons/icos/OOo_Writer.ico > > OSX: Not required > > Mime-type: > > > > > http://www.openoffice.org/ui/VisualDesign/gifs/Icons/ODF_icons/ODF_textdocument_256x256.png > > > > The original discussion on the lack of color of OO3 generated different > > options which were ignored, should we adopt them now? > > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=112141 > > > > There was some icons donated on issuezzilla: > > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118820 (not impressed) > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > -Rob > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Alexandro Colorado > > PPMC Apache OpenOffice > > http://es.openoffice.org > > > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MzK "Anyone who considers protocol unimportant has never dealt with a cat." -- Robert Heinlein
