----- Original Message -----
> From: Rob Weir <[email protected]>
...
>>
>> As a minor update, the only observation we received so far (besides a
>> substantial number of +1 votes, no abstentions or -1) was that almost all
>> the proposed PMC members do not belong to other Apache projects; our
> mentors
>> were asked if they perceived this as a problem, and we didn't get an
> answer
>> from them so far.
>>
>
> Hmmm.... I think there are several PMC members who are involved with
> other areas of Apache:
>
> 1) Don is involved with ConCom, as well as working with Sally on Press
> and Communications.
>
> 2) Others, like Oliver, Louis, etc., have been active in the ApacheCon
> planning.
>
> 3) Andrew, Juergen and Raphael have worked closely with Infra on many
> things. There may be others.
>
> 4) In general I think we're comfortable working with Trademarks and
> Legal Affairs on an ongoing basis. This includes raising questions
> and getting advice, but some, like Dennis, are active sharing what
> they have learned as well.
>
> 5) Dave is involved with POI. Don and Juergen are also on the PMC of
> the ODF Toolkit. I think Pedro said he was getting involved with a
> new BeanShell project proposal.
>
> 6) There was the work moving the SPI funds to Apache that involved
> coordinating with ASF Treasurer.
>
> So I do not know whether it is accurate to say that no one but Dave
> is "active in more than just the OO project".
>
The above is all mostly unrelated. I do think we should have included
some of our mentors in the PMC.
This was a failure in the method we chose to determine the initial PMC:
we chose based on project visibility/popularity and by their function our
mentors have tried to remain with a low profile and intervene only when
it was absolutely necessary.
This is something relatively easy to fix though, let's hope it doesn't delay
us too much.
Pedro.