2012/10/9 Ariel Constenla-Haile <[email protected]> > Hi Jürgen, * > > On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 04:58:03PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > > The build bots are still not build the same as we do for the binary > > releases (please correct me if I am wrong). Means as long as we don't > > have build bots which are building with the same configuration we should > > provide the builds manually in the same way we did it for the release. > > > > @Ariel, would that be ok for you fro now until we have a better solution? > > Yes, I will apply the set up described in > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119385 , that is, > decreasing Linux system requirements to glibc 2.5 > > Any one is welcome to take any of the two architectures (building on > Linux is multiplied by 4: rpm/deb, 32 and 64 bits; this counts on > building time and uploading the packages); if not, I will take care of > both. > > > > > I will take care of Windows and MacOS. > > > > > > > (2) How many language support can we get for this milestone build? Not > > > necessary to be 100% translated, but can be a base for volunteers to > verify > > > the translation. > > > > We should include the languages that we have released and add all > > languages where we notice active volunteers who help us to support these > > further languages (eg. Polish, Danish, Scots Gaelic, ...) > > > > > > > (3) The current development snapshot naming [a] is a little confusing > to > > > me. I wonder if we can change the naming to reflect the date of the > build? > > > > I am not sure if understand you correct. The revision is a unique > > identifier and makes it clear what went in the snapshot. We probably > > upload the builds not all on the same day. Means I am not sure how a > > date can help here. > > I guess that besides the revision, milestone builds can be identified by > their milestone number, which should be increased in every milestone > build: AOO350m1 AOO350m2 etc > > just like in OOo times there was DEV300m105 DEV300m106 etc > http://www.openoffice.org/development/releases/DEV300m106_snapshot.html > it could start now from DEV350m1 > > OK, I understand the revision now, and let's forget the "date". And I agree with Ariel that a milestone number like AOO350m1 will be better when we promote it. I personally do not think we need to use mirror. But a download page that Marcus suggested will be good.
- Simon > > Regards > -- > Ariel Constenla-Haile > La Plata, Argentina >
