On Saturday, 29 September, 2012 at 10:07 , Rob Weir wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Louis Suárez-Potts <[email protected]
> (mailto:[email protected])> wrote:
> >
> > On 12-09-29, at 03:48 , Dave Barton <[email protected]
> > (mailto:[email protected])> wrote:
> >
> > > -------- Original Message --------
> > > From: Donald Harbison <[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])>
> > > To: [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])
> > > Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:16:25 -0400
> > >
> > > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Andrew Rist <[email protected]
> > > > (mailto:[email protected])> wrote:
> > > > > I would like to nominate Andrea Pescetti.
> > > > > Andrea is one of the most active and well respected members of the
> > > > > project,
> > > > > and I believe he would make a great PMC Chair.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > +1 Andrea has demonstrated a solid understanding of open source
> > > > community leadership principles. He is articulate, and perceptive. I
> > > > believe that Andrea has passion for OpenOffice and our success, and
> > > > will make an excellent chair.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > +1 I agree.
> >
> > Am I missing something? didn't Andrea Pescetti previously state his
> > disinclination to serve in such a role?
>
> These are nominations. Nominees will have the opportunity to accept
> or decline the nomination. And if you recall, the proposed PMC roster
> includes one person who previously resigned from the PPMC. So there
> is nothing wrong with evolving one's views.
>
> -Rob
Why would there be any suggestion of anything wrong? I was just curious if
Andrea had evolved his views. I'm not criticizing any proposed name. Far from
it.
Louisk
>
> > Louis
