Thanks Andreas and Marcel, I should have contacted you earlier...
> I propose to declare the pcs package EOLed in OI and remove it in few weeks I think that would be the best idea so no one would be that misguided as me because the only reason I kept trying is that this package _is_ in the repo. Ok guys, thanks for help in anyway. > BTW, the application/cluster/pcs package is needed by metapackages/hacluster and metapackages/hacluster-remote packages. As long hacluster depends on pcs then obviously hacluster (at least in the current implementation) must be EOLed too. Anyways, thank you guys! On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 8:37 PM Marcel Telka <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 06:19:55PM +0200, Andreas Wacknitz via oi-dev > wrote: > > The fact that nobody detected the problem before showed me that we don't > > have pcs users and thus I am not sure whether the needed work is worth > > to spend. > > +1 > > I propose to declare the pcs package EOLed in OI and remove it in few > weeks, unless somebody interested in it does the needed maintenance > work. > > BTW, the application/cluster/pcs package is needed by > metapackages/hacluster and metapackages/hacluster-remote packages. > > -- > +-------------------------------------------+ > | Marcel Telka e-mail: [email protected] | > | homepage: http://telka.sk/ | > +-------------------------------------------+ > > _______________________________________________ > oi-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev > -- Mark Konnov
_______________________________________________ oi-dev mailing list [email protected] https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
