I won't get to it until summer as at the moment outdoor work here is 
tolerable, but I plan to go over the entire issue of disk labeling and 
partitioning. There are a huge number of what are retrospectively poor 
decisions and ancient cruft that needs to be addressed in format(1m). 

On consideration, I think gparted should go away and the functionality moved to 
format(1m). Of course, that presumes that the OI/Illumos community are still 
comfortable with command line tools and do not require a GUI.

I just bought an HP Z840 and will be spending the next month or so configuring 
it to build Illumos and OI in preparation for doing a modest amount of serious 
work on things that annoy me.

I'm not so old as to have dealt with SMD drives, but I had lots of experience 
with the disk geometry and remember format(1m) responding to a 5400 rpm speed 
with a "preposterous" error message.

I need to do a *lot* of reading about how modern drives behave with respect to 
alignment. At present it appears to me that we have lie stacked upon lie 
stacked upon lie. It's time for a bit of truth.

Have Fun!
Reg

     On Wednesday, April 14, 2021, 06:36:20 PM CDT, Gordon Ross 
<[email protected]> wrote:  
 
 If anyone gets around to working on gparted (or an alternative) please
consider making it use "megabyte aligned partitions" and ignore
so-called "geometry" (like partition editors do on pretty much every
other OS does now).

On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 9:02 AM Reginald Beardsley via oi-dev
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, April 13, 2021, 05:19:05 AM CDT, Aurélien Larcher 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> I know gparted is not great... I attempted to port our patchset to newer 
> versions a long time ago but it was too much work...
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> The issue is gparted dumps core on the 2020.10 Live Image. It works on the 
> 2017.10 Live Image and the 2020.10 installed system. I'm going to look very 
> closely at format as I think it might serve for EFI/GPT labels more sensibly. 
> I can see no reason for having 128 partitions. And I did manage to get a 
> traditional Sun partition table with 9 slots and an EFI label on a 5 TB disk. 
> IIRC I had to format it in Win 7 and then relabel it with format(1m).
>
> I just bought an HP Z840 with 1x 14 core E5-2690 V4 on ebay. I need to add 64 
> GB of DRAM which may be a bit of a hassle because of the global chip 
> shortage. I'm planning on 4x 4 TB disks in RAIDZ2 configuration. A single 
> slice if booting a RAIDZ2 pool with a disk missing is reliable.
>
> Have Fun!
> Reg
> _______________________________________________
> oi-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
  
_______________________________________________
oi-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev

Reply via email to