Am 19.03.17 um 18:44 schrieb Aurélien Larcher:


On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 6:42 PM, Andreas Wacknitz <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Am 19.03.17 um 18:40 schrieb Aurélien Larcher:


    On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 6:26 PM, Andreas Wacknitz
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        I just realised that we have

        library/mpich/gcc
        library/mpich/gcc/modulefiles

        and

        library/openmpi/gcc
        library/openmpi/gcc/modulefiles

        Even their package descriptions are similar. What are the
        differences and do we need both?


    Two different implementations of MPI.
    Parallel code is better against more than one implementation.
    Ok, one more question: The modulefiles packages seem to only
    provide paths, no real contents. Is that intentionally?


It is incorrect, they provide environment-modules configuration files.
Ah, ok. I was irritated. Thanks.




        Regards
        Andreas


        _______________________________________________
        oi-dev mailing list
        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
        <https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev>




-- ---
    Praise the Caffeine embeddings


    _______________________________________________
    oi-dev mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
    <https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev>
    _______________________________________________ oi-dev mailing
    list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
<https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev>
--
--- Praise the Caffeine embeddings

_______________________________________________
oi-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
_______________________________________________
oi-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev

Reply via email to